Advertisement
Just Say Yes to Performance-enhancing Drugs
www.betterhumans.com/Feature...umn.aspx
Ignore Bush: There are no good arguments for a ban and many good reasons to encourage doping
www.betterhumans.com/Feature...umn.aspx
Ignore Bush: There are no good arguments for a ban and many good reasons to encourage doping
posted by:
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
doping, as in pot? Sure I can think of many good reasons to do it. It keeps a lot more people under your thumb and controllable. Almost every daily pot smoker I know is on a fast road to nowhere. I know one professor who smokes it, and he lookes it too. I never saw him in anything other than baggy pants, wrinkled shirts, and a flannel. but hey, he gets paid a lot. The rest of them are stuck in menial jobs, because they can't pass drug tests, and because they have no ambition. But hey, we want a good controllable populace, right?
-
-
America is already dumbed down enough and still getting dumber. that article makes little sense. Even if there were differences in high altitude/low altitude entries , the sustqantial amount of difference has not been proven and if it were then only low altitude contestants should be allowed to take what is necessary to make up for the difference or else just compete amonst themselves. Even so if there already is an undeterminable difference giving overalldrug use the go ahead is just pumping iron giving another 'octave' to the same parameters and conditions for success. It comes from a bull and lies there.
-
