Advertisement
Get Married for Life
By James Hughes
www.betterhumans.com/Feature...umn.aspx
Healthy eating and exercise are fine, but maybe all you really need is a mate
By James Hughes
www.betterhumans.com/Feature...umn.aspx
Healthy eating and exercise are fine, but maybe all you really need is a mate
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Soul mates versus evolutionary psychology
Thu, February 12, 2004 - 6:38 PMI've come to the conclusion in my 40's that men and women really don't get along, despite all the cultural propaganda to the contrary. After all, evolution shaped men and women to pursue conflicting reproductive strategies.
In fact, if sex robots come along that provide sufficiently satisfactory experiences, it wouldn't surprise me that men and women will adopt them and naturally tend to segregate. An article in The Futurist magazine a few years ago about sexbots speculated that we'd see the emergence of a culture of "technovirgins," that is, people who couple exclusively with machines and have no desire to seek out biological partners.
Sexbots for men seem to offer many advantages over real sex partners. A sexbot can't get pregnant give you an STD; sue you for child support; play mind games with you about its weight (unless you're masochistic enough to program it do so!), accuse you of date rape, stalking or sexual harassment; or announce after marrying you that it has changed its sexual orientation and now prefers female partners. -
-
Re: Soul mates versus evolutionary psychology
Thu, February 12, 2004 - 9:35 PMFascinating concept. Part of me totally sees this. But I think it is more complicated than that.
Its old, but I used to tell a story to classes that I knew the answer to the age old question posed by ancient philosophers "If an irresistable force meets an immovable object, which wins?" The answer is, the immovable object. I have had arguements with my wife where I used every persuasive skill in my pretty deep bag. I used charts and reason and a loud voice and witnesses and citations and common sense, and more and more and more....., but lost. And you know what? She was often right. At a deep level, it IS a way to embrace a deeper insight into the universe. I mean that in the altered state of consciousness, realize what limitations we place on ourselves by using 'words' instead of directly apprehending the cosmos.
Finally, back to what you said. My point is this. I'm not sure it is necessary for men and women to get along to need each other, in a 'selfish gene' open your senses to the universe kind of way.
-
